Samsung Galaxy M32 vs Cubot X50
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M32 and Cubot X50. Find out which smartphone has better performance.
Performance (Benchmarks)
| 676 | 3DMark for Android Wild Life | 652 |
| 6540 | PCMark for Android Work 3.0 | 6556 |
| 9649 | PCMark for Android Storage 2.0 | 5508 |
Specs
| Samsung Galaxy M32 | Model name | Cubot X50 |
| Android 11 | Operating system (OS) | Android 11 |
| Bluetooth WLAN | Network Connectivity | Bluetooth WLAN NFC |
| Yes, Type-C | Interfaces / connectors | Yes, Type-C |
Display
| 2400 × 1080 px | Resolution | 2400 × 1080 px |
| Super AMOLED | Technology | IPS |
| Yes | Multi‑Touch | Yes |
| 6.4" | Screen size | 6.67" |
Processor (CPU)
| Up to 2.0 GHz dual-core ARM Cortex-A75 & 1.8 GHz hexa-core ARM Cortex-A55 | CPU Architecture | Up to 2.0 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A73 & 2.0 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 |
| Helio G80 | CPU | MT6771V |
| Mali G52 MC2 | GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 |
Storage
| 4096 / 6144 MB | RAM (Memory) | 8192 MB |
| 64 / 128 GB | Storage (ROM) | 128 GB |
| microSD / microSDHC / microSDXC | Card slot | microSD / microSDHC / microSDXC |
Camera
| Yes, 64 MP | Rear Camera(s) | Yes, 64 MP |
| Yes, 20 MP | Selfie Camera(s) | Yes, 32 MP |
Networks
| GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | 2G | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | 3G | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE 800 / 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2300 / 2500 / 2600 | 4G (LTE) | LTE 700 / 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 / 2300 / 2500 / 2600 |
Location
| Yes | GPS | Yes |
| Yes | A-GPS | Yes |
Battery
| varies by model mAh | Battery capacity | 4500 mAh |
Design
| 74 / 159.3 / varies by model mm | Dimensions | 75 / 171 / 9 mm |
| varies by model g | Weight | g |